Cancer Thesis Statement

It is said that as a man thinketh, so is he. And when it comes to defining ourselves as human, then we must be careful that our thought is of the highest quality. This is because, if we have optimal qualities of thought, then we can have optimal lives. How we can know of what optimal being is, must be by measuring. As ancient tradition posits, ‘Man is the measure of all things’. The interpretation we hold today is that all things are measured up against a standard inherent in the human being. That’s why it was essential for a person to know his/her self. This measure of the self is a standard simulated by geometry. The geometry itself was born out of deep meditation, and a deep, unknowable voice spoke through a human, to another human. And, these words were the basis of oral tradition. Rigorous ways for understanding what was being said were constructed. These were the ways of logic, exegesis, and rhetoric. And arguments became the way to establish truth.

An argument has a specific structure:

  • A thesis
  • Definition and elaboration
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion

Now, knowing where arguments come from, how they are structured, and what they are for; we are able to know the importance of making a thesis statement for cancer, especially in the argumentative essay.

The above structure of an argument may hide the kind of process necessary for the generation of an argument. Here is the sequence:

  • Acceptance of source
  • Hearing
  • Meditation
  • Formulation
  • Exegesis
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion

This method was in use by the time of Thomas Aquinas and the scholastics. But it goes far much back in history even to the great Egyptian civilization and even lower Nubia. It goes back into ancient people of the various continents. Historical data shows that knowledge and humanity are both intuitive and logical and the two mingle together towards unity, a universal nature. Simply put, there’s a universal method of argumentation and thesis formation. Therefore a cancer thesis statement is amenable to these ancient and traditional rules that bind all humans equally.

Why Argumentation May be Infamous

The Copernican revolution brought with it great change. Because the home of scholastic tradition – the church, was destabilized and now there was rivalry for power between Church and secular forces humanity went further into a kind of discourse that has perceived differentiation and separation of races that went into modernity in thinkers like Hegel, and Marx, and even now argumentation has been converted into a tool of separation and conflict. The reformation castigated reason and argumentation, and even now, freedom of speech is under threat because argumentation seems to threaten authority.

Political Economy Interference

The model of argumentation established by the ancients presupposed a kind of political economy in which resources were deemed as unlimited. But with the emergence of rivalry and intensification of differences, the political economy converted into an exclusivist model. This model has had a deep effect on how thesis statement on cancer is formed. In recent cases, courts have ruled in favor of theses showing how some agent causes cancer, only to find counter-arguments by members of other scientific fields involved, gaining traction. Many a thesis about cancer appears to have fallen along the way due to lack of funds and lack of political will.

Human Renaissance Informing Statements about Cancer

If we may use the statements about cancer that may have fallen off, not because they were untrue, but because they were infamous or out of favor as a measure of how humanity has sunk low; then it wouldn’t be a surprise that more theses sink for political and economic reasons rather than for being untrue.

Just as the Renaissance in Europe was determined on finding the ways of the ancients, so must we of the present times remember the past and the ancients and evaluate and use their ways so that we may ennoble ourselves. It is possible to find true answers and enact them for a great life for the individual and the community. Such a world view anticipates equality for all humans, and designates compassion and goodwill for all people of the world irrespective of creed or race.

Hence, it is a call to all scholars to remember the method mentioned above as the basis of making their thesis statement for cancer. It is the method that recalls the universality and equality of all humans and is also the most conducive for truth and prosperity. It is a return to the golden age of humanity. If we make our cancer thesis, to be like other theses in our lives that are determined by the highest quality of thought as we have seen, then we can be certain of great feats and great lives.

Remembering the Method for Argumentation

Elements of ancient methodology of argumentation and thought are buried in our history. For example, when we ask ourselves how it could be that precious little may be known about a figure like Pythagoras, yet his name is attached to great theories and theorems; or Jesus Christ, a critical yet divisive figure, we find our questions confounded many a times. It takes so much work and intuition facilitated by the universal mind to remember the truth about our past. As such, contemporary push toward a global renaissance must not forget that ancient people of wisdom had a peculiar relation with truth. For all argumentation and utterance were devoted to it. So, even for us now, we should devote any thesis statement for cancer essay to truth.

Modes of Truth as Bedrock

We need to ask ourselves how we can know what is true in general, so that when we embark on the task of making a cancer thesis statement we can be assured that we are on the golden path. A search into history reveals that there are basically six ways in which we can find the truth. These are:

  • Perception
  • Inference
  • Authority
  • Comparison
  • Derivation
  • Non being

The Use of Perception in Making Cancer Thesis Statement

Each of these modes has well defined limits. For example, perception must be reliable. A person with anger and resentment towards others may not be trusted to perceive causes and effects well enough. If an enemy does a commendable thing, then the hateful researcher is likely to look away or find reason to castigate the enemy. Therefore, one must be careful so that his/her perception may be optimal. The ancients practiced yoga to achieve such optimal status. Looking at Iamblicus’ accounts of the great Pythagoras we find so much that is akin to yoga practice. Most Indian schools, both theistic and atheistic alike, practice yoga. Yoga was a practice even in ancient Kemet. Nordic and most European mythology point at what may be termed yoga practice. Only the training in yoga practice can help a human to have enough equanimity to perceive things as they are. Therefore, the task of making a cancer thesis statement for a golden people needs to begin with perfect yoga.

Laws of Inference

In the beginning there’s a substance, then the substance evolves itself into the Universe that is still the substance. Such knowledge as expressed through the millennia that have past couldn’t have been known intuitively but established logically. This form of logical establishment has always followed the laws of mathematics and linguistics. In Indian Philosophy, the Nyaya School has been like a custodian of logic discourse and investigation. Logic and logical analysis has been developed most rigorously in America and Europe. The works of C. S. Peirce, for example, have been great and illuminating in our quest for understanding the statements we make, and in particular, thesis statements about cancer.

Authority as Source of Thesis Statement on Cancer

Authority entails what is unavailable to an audience through the ways of perception and inference, yet upon close inspection, it is found that the statements made are true. Such statements are made by people who have been well trained and prepared for knowledge work. These people normally transmit their knowledge while in deep meditation. All human scripture can be shown to have developed from such sources.

Yet their work, be it a thesis about cancer, must conform to logic and most not confound perception and inference. In fact, the Mimamsa school of Indian philosophy explicates this matter carefully as they are the custodians of the interpretation of the Vedas through yogic self-sacrifice as shown above.

Comparison as Source of Truth for Statements about Cancer

Statements about cancer can be derived when different diseases are compared and contrasted. For example, Karl Popper came to knowledge about humans causing illnesses to themselves via guilt after comparing many cases of disease and the psychological characteristics of many of the cases he investigated.

Yet, it can now be shown how the human mind engineers a path towards its destiny, and that other factors not withstanding a human will kill him or herself if so determined.

Derivation of Fact for Thesis Statement for Cancer

A way of truth that is similar to that of comparison in the sense of reliance of great numbers of cases is that of derivation. Some Indian philosophers do not accept this source of truth. But if truth is measured for its cogency, correspondence to reality and practical usage, then it is easy to show that patterns that are cyclical are true if their cyclicity can be detected. In this case, it is possible for one to derive a thesis statement for cancer by deriving facts from many cases.

Non-Being as a Source of Truth

Non-being or non-existence is a source of truth if for example, in the case of comparison and contrast we notice that members of a certain class have one of them with an absent quality that held by the other members. This case of non-being can then be used to form a hypothesis, and eventually a cancer thesis.

The Method of Argumentation

A thesis statement for cancer essay, as we mentioned earlier, and especially for argumentative thought, is derived from a very specific method and mindset when we wish to talk of a golden age of humanity. We have shown the various sources of truth and some of their conditions for optimality. We are now able to execute the method. But before we explicate on each of the practices, let us remind ourselves of the method’s components. They are:

  • Acceptance of source
  • Hearing
  • Meditation
  • Formulation
  • Exegesis
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion

We have seen that there are various sources of truth. It is important for the thinker to consider the utterances that form the primary sources of his or her argument. Once these are known and accepted as valid, then the thinker and researcher is ready to get to the next level.

Hearing and Listening to Texts

One cannot listen without surrendering to the source of truth. Otherwise, if the thinker doesn’t surrender, then perception will be dented and the discourse will prove futile and erroneous. Therefore it is important for the thinker to surrender to an accepted source of truth. This is a difficult practice in our times and is probably a source of great suffering for many.

Meditation as a Spring of an Authentic Thesis Statement about Cancer

Meditation is basically focusing on a thing with the mind’s eye and concentrating completely on it till the thing’s truth about itself is revealed. As such statements about cancer are generated when the thinker focuses completely and avails the mind to the text received from the accepted source.

Formulation of Source’s Utterance

Once the utterance of the text from the source of truth reveals itself to the faculties of the listener and thinker, then the latter is ready to write down the utterance received in a form that is logical and faithful to the utterance. Finding the exact formulation is often a matter of exegesis.

Exegesis

The Mimamsa School reminds us of the proper technique for exegesis:

  • One needs to be conscious of translations made between speaker and listener
  • Then the historical context is factored into the utterance
  • Then the limits of the historical context are identified in the utterance
  • Finally, the context is applied in creating an interpretation

Discussion for Elaboration

A formulated statement can then be discussed using the four modes of thought as applicable (Expository, Analytic, Argumentative, and Implementive/Empirical thought). It is such a discussion then that leads to a conclusion, and it is this conclusion that forms the cancer thesis statement.

Conclusion

With the above considerations, you are fully equipped to handle any thesis that may be assigned to you. A thesis statement about cancer, just like any other type of thesis statement, can be well tackled by following this guide.

Other interesting articles